The last time I was reading an article on Engadget.com (a blog I was enjoying a lot in its early days), I was shocked by the amount of advertising on it. A whole bunch of Google Ad packs, and next to that there’s the overload of Weblogs Inc. promotional material.
So I made this scheme, to visually compare the use of space:
The red part is the actual article, orange are the comments, yellow the navigation.
Black are paid ads, and gray is property of Weblogs Inc. (Click for full view)
Related:
People often come across a web hosting service only when a business opportunity requires them to do so. That is when they first hear of domain registration and other aspects of hosting. A novice may get confused between a cheap web hosting and one promising the cheapest domain name. Hence such decisions should only be made after consulting internet marketing gurus. Neophytes often tend to pick a photoshop design for their site and consider things finished there.
May 14th, 2006 at 9:52 pm
That’s insane ..
May 14th, 2006 at 10:06 pm
That’s the reason I hate Engadget.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:06 am
Get an RSS reader…
May 15th, 2006 at 2:07 am
…and the reason I love RSS.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:16 am
dont hate on engadget, it’s jason calacanis fault. he (with his greed and avarice) ruined what was once a fine site.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:18 am
errm…. at least its interesting and provides information? Can some competition of this blog now do a visual breakdown of it? Good, now I can waste more of my time. KThxBai.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:30 am
I love adblock….
It lets me love engadget…
May 15th, 2006 at 2:41 am
Use RSS. You get nothing but the article and a tiny ad at the bottom. Also, it is delivered right to your computer. Good stuff.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:43 am
ass holes, they have to pay the bills, do you ass holes willing to pay the $1000+ webhost bill for for them? if no stfu.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:43 am
your blog is pretty bad too…..
May 15th, 2006 at 2:49 am
FILE UNDER: FUCKING LAME! …LOSERS!
May 15th, 2006 at 2:50 am
I think someone should stop being shocked and write a greasemonkey to dump the crap and load only the article. i’d do it but i don’t know javascript.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:51 am
would have been more accurate if you had chosen an article with no commments.
May 15th, 2006 at 2:59 am
I think people are over reacting here - by the looks of it appart from the bottom of the page - anywhere you’re looking, the majority of the screen is unbroken content.
I think that’s a very reasonable mix of content and adds - i barely even notice ads i they don’t intrude into the content.
May 15th, 2006 at 3:06 am
That just sucks. I hate success. Anyone who makes money should go to hell. How do they think that they could get away with this? I feel so used.
May 15th, 2006 at 3:26 am
PS: don’t break the web with rel=”nofollow”. If you’re afraid of comment spam, filter it. Don’t punish people who try to post an honest comment.
May 15th, 2006 at 3:26 am
hmm… seems pretty much in keep with this blog page:
1. one small article on top,
2. a bunch a google advertising
3. and a bunch of self promotional links down the side!
yup! exactly the same!
May 15th, 2006 at 3:50 am
@ianubis: Ummm, $1000+? I’d love to see where you get these figures. The most expensive thing you can get is a dedicated server, which usually costs around maybe $100+ a month. But a site like that can easily run on shared hosting, which usually runs around $10/month for a decent package.
GG.
May 15th, 2006 at 4:26 am
Hmmm looks like most of the site is navigation and content… I’m a little confused what the issue is here. People need to make a living and advertising is one way to do it. I am always confused why people think every thing should be free.
May 15th, 2006 at 5:39 am
there are a ton of websites/blogs like this and it’s just plain annoying. i have often joked that a lot of websites nowadays are more advertisements than content. look at any of the big sites - ivillage.com, bhg.com (betterhomesandgardens), etc. and there’s very little content there. i don’t mind a few google ads, but most websites now are more distracting than inviting. barf.
May 15th, 2006 at 5:39 am
Just because Engadget has a lot of advertising space doesn’t mean it’s bad or anything? Seriously, you all say it’s shit just becuase it looks overpoweringly ad-y, but the truth is, it delivers content mostly unbiased that’s reliable and has, more or less, remained so. I find it great that they make money off of a popular site; that helps pay for bandwidth, web space, and more article writers.
May 15th, 2006 at 5:41 am
I don’t think havung too many ads is bad but they should reduce it if possible. Anyhow, their articles are pretty decent..
May 15th, 2006 at 5:42 am
that’s how they pay for the server farm.
Vouksh know much about hosting? $10 hosting?
Heard of overselling?
engaget can’t run on shared hosting, or a crappy $100 box with all the traffic they get.
You get what you pay for
May 15th, 2006 at 6:01 am
I really don’t see the problem here at all. The ads are pretty unobtrusive, all text-based, and their RSS is ad-free.
May 15th, 2006 at 6:51 am
you all need to die . fuck off dont be hatein on engadget. they fuckin rule thats were most of the othor web sites get there shit from so fuck off. they are the best and who ever wrote this artical is a reatrd and deserves to get mauled and stabed manny manny times.
Have A Nice Day!!
May 15th, 2006 at 8:24 am
This is ridiculous. Engadget articles never take up much room, so of course there is going to be a huge amount of space for ads. Notice how much of the space is delegated to the article/comments/navigation, not just how small the article is compared to everything else…
May 15th, 2006 at 8:29 am
I didn’t say I hate Engadget, I said I’m shocked by the amount of advertising. That’s all. I know it’s quality content, and I keep reading it. But it would be so much better if they bundled the advertising or dumped some of it.
May 15th, 2006 at 9:07 am
[...] Gisteren had ik nu eens echt bewust een “artikel” gezet op Photoshopblog.net met als enige doel de voorpagina van Digg.com te halen. [...]
May 15th, 2006 at 9:44 am
The choice of coloring for ads vs. Weblogs Inc. is poor in this diagram. They’re both dark shades of gray, making it look like there’s more advertising than there really is.
If anything, the giant, uninterrupted block of orange, shows how community orientated the site is, by having a lot of comments.
May 15th, 2006 at 10:16 am
Dam I didn’t even realize how much advertising Engadget has on it until this article. They provide great information so I don’t mind the ads so much as I don’t really click on them.
May 15th, 2006 at 1:55 pm
[...] Photoshopblog has an interesting post that highlights (in visual form) the breakdown of different components of Engadget - specifically looking at the amount of the blog dedicated to the article itself, comments, site navigation, advertising and Weblog Inc navigation. [...]
May 15th, 2006 at 2:59 pm
I agree with Joost Schuur. The Weblogs network and Advertising are the same color, and it’s unfair. Why use two shades of gray, while never using green, blue, purple, etc?
May 15th, 2006 at 3:08 pm
Yep thats the reason I don’t visit Engadget too often.
I prefer Digg (even though theyre designed to report different topics)
May 15th, 2006 at 4:00 pm
[...] The content to ad/junk ratio of this Engadget page reminds me a heck of a lot of this rip into PC Magazine from a couple years ago. [...]
May 15th, 2006 at 4:27 pm
@Joost Schuur: I din’t choose the colors ad random. I took black for the Google ads, and gray for Weblogs Inc. ads, because they’re still ads, but it’s more acceptable. So I choose a lighter gray to accentuate this. The parts of Engadget itself, navigation, post and comments, are shades between yellow and red.
May 15th, 2006 at 5:21 pm
Ah, the age old problem of how much commercialization is appropriate.
It’s not an easy question to answer. If it doesn’t stop you from reading… and doesn’t spawn popups, popunders and other crap, why not.
However, I do like it when the ads are segregated such that I can choose to view them or not.
May 15th, 2006 at 5:43 pm
There you are, the main reason why I am not switching from Firefox to Internet Explorer 7, I cannot live without the AdBlock extension
May 15th, 2006 at 10:28 pm
[...] This is just a cool breakdown of Engadget.com - take a look at the division of space given to content, advertising, and the Weblogs Inc network. Make of it whatever you want. From Digg « Do you really need search on your website? [...]
May 15th, 2006 at 11:02 pm
the ads aren’t so bad. they’re text-based and you can read the article before they’ve loaded, i.e. they don’t have some bad layout/markup that prevents the actual content from displaying as the ads load, or causes it to jump around. but the amount of space the weblogs inc. stuff takes up is indeed ridiculous.
May 15th, 2006 at 11:28 pm
@joel, #12
Platypus is an extension that helps you “write” a Greasemonkey script to strip out the stuff you don’t want on a web page. I use it to strip out everything on Engadget other than the article and the comments and it works great (otherwise I’d have a hard time stomaching the site).
May 15th, 2006 at 11:58 pm
1) Who cares?
2) Read their RSS Feed.
May 16th, 2006 at 2:59 pm
Wait a minute — the “articles” aren’t ads?
May 16th, 2006 at 7:30 pm
[...] Photoshopblog has posted an interesting article regarding the ads and other real estate breakdown on Engadget blog. [...]
May 16th, 2006 at 8:53 pm
Visual breakdown of advertising area on Engadget
I think the major problem with Web 2.0 in China or
the whole Chinese internet market from reaching its real value is
advertising.
May 17th, 2006 at 3:24 pm
QUOTE:
# Andy Brudtkuhl | May 15th, 2006 at 11:58 pm
1) Who cares?
2) Read their RSS Feed.
For people who visit the site for the first time:
1) It’s unclear which f***king RSS Feed they should use.
2) They won’t want an RSS from such a sh***y page, full of bs ads.
So go cry. Everybody cares how a web page looks.
May 22nd, 2006 at 2:58 pm
[...] beim Photoshopblog wurde eine grafische Analyse von Engadget erstellt, um aufzuzeigen, wie hoch der Werbeflächenanteil gegenüber dem normalen Bloganteil (Content + Navigation) ist. Erinnert mich etwas an meine Analyse über Problogger Darrens Digitalkamera-Blog, das etwas heftiger als Engadegt abschneidet. [...]
July 19th, 2006 at 7:34 pm
[...] 2. Sponsorship - If Nascar can paint its cars with logo’s, why can’t you? Ok, Nascar is a really bad example (can you imagine the blogging equivalent of a Nascar car? Why it might look like this). Here is a good example: sponsored links. Sell a small portion of your site to advertisers, clearly label it, profit. If you want someone else to manage it, consider a text link ad brokering service (Text Link Ads [full disclosure, affiliate link]) [...]
August 31st, 2006 at 3:12 pm
[...] How much advertising is there on the Engadget.com site? And how much screen space demands Weblogs Inc.? Take a look at this comprehensive breakdown.read more | digg story [...]
November 24th, 2006 at 2:18 am
hair
March 1st, 2007 at 7:11 pm
I have been looking for sites like this for a long time. Thank you!e
March 14th, 2007 at 2:33 am
Bad news
March 14th, 2007 at 12:57 pm
ERR s
March 25th, 2007 at 2:24 pm
Via Dolorosa songs…
Via Dolorosa songs…
November 3rd, 2007 at 6:49 pm
Why can’t celebrity lesbians you can give it hard cock lengthened out this.
January 1st, 2008 at 9:32 pm
ddr adults weight loss
January 15th, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Well underage girl models from his chest for me wonder what.
January 20th, 2008 at 3:10 pm
aCYngO hi great site thx http://peace.com
January 31st, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Jade smiled, british sex when we met at just a mental note to dance.
March 4th, 2008 at 12:33 am
google
March 24th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
zN1iiG great site man thx http://peace.com
May 19th, 2008 at 1:41 am
preved, free sex pics, 0644,
May 21st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
this is a best site, free sex trailers, 8-P,
May 24th, 2008 at 3:19 am
gdsgdsf gdsfgdsfg sdgfgdsfg sdfgdsf g2 tickets to toby keith at allegan
May 30th, 2008 at 9:23 am
preved, ïîðíî áäñì áåñïëàòíî ñêà÷àòü, rsh,
May 31st, 2008 at 8:12 am
sweet site dude )) i love u springsteen
June 1st, 2008 at 3:39 am
hjhgdf gfhf gdfhgf dghfh hgfh pre teen 3gp
June 1st, 2008 at 9:59 pm
gdfgs dgfh gdsfgdf fgd gdfg dsdgfh free lolitas xxx porn
June 10th, 2008 at 10:43 am
Visit this link please, naughty nat anal
, :-[[[,
June 12th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Good luck, bondage bdsm sex
, dtrj,
June 13th, 2008 at 3:56 am
Preved webmastero4ki, bdsm bondage with chicken wire
, bivi,
June 13th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Visit this link please, bdsm movies amateur
, onq,
June 15th, 2008 at 4:31 am
Excellent work, Nice Design http://google.us/group/qteens teen cyber chat 021708
June 24th, 2008 at 1:23 am
Either way, honey. Better future! gang bang swinger Peter joined in.
June 25th, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Nice stuff, áåñïëàòíî äåâî÷êó âèäåî, vecg,
June 26th, 2008 at 1:27 am
Visit this link please, äîìàøíåå ïîðíî äåâà÷åê, 8(,
June 26th, 2008 at 4:28 am
Sorry, ñåêñ ìèíåò âèäåî, xxcg,
June 26th, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Visit this link please, ìîáèëüíûé ñåêñ ÷àò, 7675,
June 27th, 2008 at 2:43 am
Preved webmastero4ki, ÿîé ÿîé ÿîé, xxoz,
June 27th, 2008 at 4:03 am
Preved webmastero4ki, ôîòî ñåêñ òðàõàíüå, >:-))),
June 27th, 2008 at 7:59 am
Preved webmastero4ki, ãåé âèäèî ôîòî, 007940,
June 28th, 2008 at 9:44 pm
This is a best site, ïðîñòèòóòêè ìîñêâà íîâîêîñèíî, %)),
July 6th, 2008 at 3:19 am
great work dude thx
July 6th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
great work great site 10x lolita hardcore sex
July 15th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Preved webmastero4ki, anal magazine, :(,
July 18th, 2008 at 6:50 am
Good luck, amateur wife anal, fmo,
July 18th, 2008 at 11:55 am
This is a best site, http://sites.google.com/site/analcreampiemovies1/lesbian-anal-movies big huge booties anal sex, >:]]],
July 18th, 2008 at 4:44 pm
Cool site, http://sites.google.com/site/analcreampiemovies1/roccos-true-anal-stories anal tearing, >:[[,
July 18th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Sorry, http://sites.google.com/site/analcreampiemovies1/roccos-true-anal-stories anal creampie movies, 9460,
July 19th, 2008 at 12:10 am
Preved webmastero4ki, http://miaiemel.narod.ru/porno-incest-porno-47.html ïîðíî êëèïû ïîñìîòðåòü áåç ñìñ, shhk,
July 31st, 2008 at 10:05 pm
wow cool site dude 10x
see u my animal sex tube
August 1st, 2008 at 4:03 am
gfdg ggh dfhdfh fgh hgdfhg dfdasfgf dshfg h porno hub big tits
August 1st, 2008 at 6:21 am
Nice stuff, http://uluuosyboluno.narod.ru/page-68.html ëèçàòü ïîïó, 746,
August 1st, 2008 at 7:12 am
gdfg hgfh hj ggdgfh fghjgf jdf hfg j youtubeporno
August 2nd, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Cool site, elephantlists, ahxbp,
August 7th, 2008 at 7:31 pm
Histeeth were firm and explained that hot babe gets anal fuck by friend whosoever should believe.
August 29th, 2008 at 12:59 am
comment4, ôîòêè êðàñèâûõ ìàëîëåòîê, %O,
August 29th, 2008 at 4:00 am
comment4, âèäåî ïðî íàñèëîâàíèå, 25507,
October 4th, 2008 at 10:26 am
comment5, 0 7 keygen mybittorrent nero premium, 61418,
October 6th, 2008 at 7:58 pm
comment1,
October 6th, 2008 at 10:26 pm
comment4,
November 8th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
comment1, øêîëüíèöû äàþò ïîðíî ôîòî, swvcz,
November 10th, 2008 at 1:58 am
comment2, staind epiphany, %))),
November 13th, 2008 at 3:22 am
comment3, secretaryporn, %-[[,
November 13th, 2008 at 11:21 am
comment3, pompeii pornography, jgoz,
November 14th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
comment4, dragon porn quest, 8O,
December 24th, 2008 at 12:28 am
??? ??????? ??????, ??? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ???????? ????? ????? ??????. ?? ?????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????????????????? ???????????? ?????? ???? ?????????? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ?????? ??? ????? ???????? ??? ???, ??? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ?? ?? ?????? ??????? ?? ??? ? ???????? ?????? ?? ?? ?????????? ??????????????? ?????? ??? ??, ??????????? ??????. ??? ???? ???????? ?????. ????? ? ???????? ???, ??? ????????????, ??? ?????? ??????? ?????????? 2001 ???? ????? ??? ?????????? ??? ??? ?????. ?????? ???????? ?? ??????????? ????? ???????????. ???, ??? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ? ?????? ????? ??????. ?????? ? ?????? ????????? ??? ?????? ? ?????? ????? ??????. ??????????? ??????? ?? ???? ?????????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????. ????????? ???????? ? ???? ??? ??? ????? ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????? ?. ??? ??????? ??? ???? ??????? ????, ??? ?????? ?????, ??? ????. ??????? ?? ???? ?????????? ????? ???????? ???????????? ? ???? ?. ? ??????????? ? ???? ??? ???? ???????????, ??? ????? ????? ? ??????? ???????? ?????. ?????? ? ?????? ??? ???????????? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ???? ????????? ?????? ?? ????????, ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ?????? ??? ???????? ? ???? ??? ? ???????? ??????????? ?????? ??????.
????? ??? ???????? ????? ????????? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? ? ???????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ??????????. ? ????? ?????? ?????? ?? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ?. ???? ?????????? ??????? ? ??????? ??????. ???? ??? ???? ?????? ????? ?????????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ? ? ??????? ?? ?????????? ?? ????? ??? ???????? ????? ????? ? ??????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ? ????? ??????? ????????? ????? ?????????.
? ????? ?? ????? ????? ?????????????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ? ???. ????? ??? ?????????????? ???? ???? ????????? ?????? ? ?????? ????????? ? ??? ?????????? ???????? ? ?????? ? ? ?? ????????? ?????? ??? ??? ?????? ??????. ?????? ?????????? ????????? ? ????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ?? ???????? ??????. ??? ???? ? ??? ??????????? ????? ????? ????? ? ??? ?? ??????? ??? ? ????? ??? ??????? ???? ? ????????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ?? ?? ??????? ?????? ???? ????????? ????? ?? ????? ?????????? ????.????????? ?? ??? ??? ???? ???????? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ?? ?????, ????????? ???? ?????????. ????? ?????? ?????? ??? ????????? ????? ?? ????? ? ??? queen ?? ?????? ????? ??????????? ??????????. ??????? ?? ???? ? ??? ??? ? ???????????? ??????. ??? ?? ???? ??????????? ???. ? ??? ?????????? ?????? ??????? ?? ???????????????? ??????, ??? ????? ?????? ?, ??? ??? ??? ????? ?? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????????? ????? ?, ????? ??? ???? ??, ??? ????? ??????? ?? ????.
???????? ? ???????????. ?????? ?? ???? ??? ?????? ????????? 2 ???? ??????? ????? ? ???????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ?????, ??? ??? ?????? ??? ????? ??? ?? ??????? ?????? ?????? ???? ????? ???? ??? ? ???????? ????????? ?????? ? ?? ???????? ????? ?????? ?? ? - ?????????????? ???????? 336% ? ???????. ??????? ????? ?????????? ???????? ? ??? ???? ????????? ???????????? ?????. ?????? ?????? ??? ??????????? ??? ?????? ???? ??????? ??????????? ???? ?????? ??????? ??????????? ???????????? ???? ??????? ????????? ??????? ???? ? ???? ???????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ???????? ?????.
? ??????? ? ?????? ?????????, ????????? ???????? ???????????? ??????? ?????? ?????? ? ??????????? ?? ? ???????? ? ????. ?????? ???? ?????? ????? ?? ?????????????????? ?? ? ???? ?????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ? ???????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?? ????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ???????? - ?????????????? 336% ? ??? ?? ?? ??, ??? ?????? ????? ????????????? ? ???? ??????? ??? ?? ?????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????? ?? ??? ??????????. ?????? ????? ?????????? ? ?????? ? ?????????? ?? ? ?????? ? ???????????? ???????? ???? ?????? ??????????? ???? ???? ?????????? ? ??? ?????. ??? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ??? ??????? ?????? ?? ?????????? 2001 ???? ???? ???? ???????? - ?????????????? 336% ??? ???????? ???????. ??????? ??????? ????, ??? ?????? ??????. ?? ????????, ??? ??? ????? ?????????? ???????????? ???? ???? ? ???????? ???? ??? ???????. ? ???? ??????????? ? ?? ?? ?? ??? ????? ??????? ??????? ???? ??????. ??????????? ??, ??? ?? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ???????? ?????? ??? ??????????? ????? ?????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????????????? ???????? 336% - ?? ?, ???????? ????????? ???????, ????? ????. ??? ?????? ?? ? ? ??? ?????? ????????????? ???????????? ?????. ??? ??? ????????? ??????? ????????? ???????? ???? ?????. ??????? ???????? ? ???? ??? ?????? ???.
??? ????? ??? ???????????? ????? ? ?????? ??????? ??????? ????????? ? ????. ??? ????? ???????? ?????, ??? ???????????? ????? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ? ??????? ???? ??. ? ??????????? ? ?? ????? ??????????? ? ?????? ????? ??? ?? ?????? ??? ??? ??????? ????? ???????? ?????? ??????? ? ?? ? ????? ????. ?????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ???????? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ?-? ?????? ??????? ?????? ???????? ??? ???????? ???? ? ??????? ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ???? ???????, ??????? ????????? ?????? ????? ?????. ??? ????? ???????? ????? ??? ?????????? ????????????.
?, ???? ????? ??? ????? ??????????? ????? ? ???? ???? ????????? ?????? ? ????????? ??? ????? ???? ????? ? ?????? ???? ??? ?????? ?????? ???? ? ????????? ???????? ? ?????. ?, ???? ? ????? ????????????? ????? ? ????? ??? ????? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ???? ????????? ?? ? ???? ?? ? ???? ?????? ??????????? ??????? ????? ???? ?? ???????? ????????? ?-? ?????????? ????? ?????. ??? ???????????? ????? ?? ????????? ???????? ?, ??? ????? ????? ?????? ? ????????? ?? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ??????? ???????????. ?? ???? ??? ?????? ????? ?????????. ?? ???, ??? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ?????? ????? ?????? ??? ???. ?-? ?????????? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ???????, ???? ?????? ???? ??????? ??? ??? ?? ?? ???? ???????????????? ??? ???????? ?? ???? ??????. ?? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????? ???????? ??????? ? ???????????? ?. ?????? ?????? ?????? ? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ?-? ?????????? ??????????? ??????????????? ????????? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ????? ????? ??????????? ????????, ??? ?????????? ? ????????? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ??????? ????????????? ???. ?, ???? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?????? ???????????? ? ??? ????? ?????? ??????? ? ????????? ???????????? ???? ???? ?????????? ?-? ????????, ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ?? ??????? ????????? ?????? ?????????? ???? ?????.
?????? ???? ? ??? ?? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?? ???????? ????? ????????? ? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ? ??????????? ???????? ???? ????? ??????? ? ???????? ????????? ?? ???????? ??? ??? ???????? ???????? ??????? ?????? ? ????? ????? ???????. ??????? ?? ????????: ??????? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ??? ????? ?????????? ? ??? ????. ??? ?????????? ???? ? ????? ???????? ??? ????? ? ??? ???????.
???? ??? ?????????? ????????? ?? ?????????????????? ????? ???????? ?? ?, ????????? ?? ?? ???? ? ????? ????? ???????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ????? ? ???? ????????? ????? ??????????? ?? ?????????? ?? ??? ????? ???????? ????? ????? ?? ?????????? ??????????????? ?????? ????????: ??? ??????? ??????? ???? ????. ?????????? ????????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ??????? ???????? ??????????? ?????????? ?????????????. ? ?? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ???????. ? ??? ????? ? ? ????????????, ???? ?????? ????? ?????. ??????? ?? ?????????? ????????????? ????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ?, ??????? ??????? ? ??????????. ??????? ????????: ??? ??????? ???? ?? ??? ?? ???? ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ?????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ??? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ?? ?????, ??? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ??????????? ?????? ????? ???? ??? ?? ???????, ??????? ?? ???? ? ???????. ????? ?? ?????????? ? ?????? ??????, ???????? ????? ??????. ??????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ?????????. ????????: ??? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ? ???? ???? ??? ? ??? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ????? ?????? ???????????? ? ???????? ???? ?????? ???????? ???? ????? ??????? ????, ??? ???????? ????? ??????????? ? ??? ????? ? ???????????. ??????? ???????????? ???? ????? ?? ?? ??????? ????. ? ??????? ??? ???? ? ????????, ??? ?????? ???????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ????????: ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ??.
?????????? ?? ???????? ???????? ????????? ??? ? ????????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ????????. ????? ? ? ?????? ??? ?????? ??????????? ??????????? ????????????. ???? ?????? ? ????? ?????? ???????? ????? ?? ? ????? ?????????? ? ?? ???? ???????? ?? ?????????? ????????? ? ??????? ????? ?????????? ?? ?? ??????? ????? ?? ???????. ????????????? ??????? ?????? ????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ?????????.
??????? ? ??? ??????????? ??? ?????? ???????????? ???? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ???? ????? ? ??????? ?? ????? ? ??????? ???????????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ?????? ? ????? ???????? ???????? ???????? ? ? ?????. ??? ???????? ??????? ? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ???? ????? ??????????? ????? ????????????? ??????? ?? ?? ????? ??????? ?? ???? ?? ???? ?????????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ??????? ????? ??? ??? ? ? ?????? ?? ?? ??????????? ? ????? ? ???????????? ?? ?????? ???????? ??? ?????? ????? ? ?? ?????. ????? ??????? ??? ? ???????? ?? ???????? ??????????? ???????????? ????? ??? ??. ???????? ????? ? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ??????? ????????????? ????? ??? ??????? ??????? ??? ?? ???????? ?????????? ??????? ?? ???????? ????? ?? ?????????? ????? ? ?? ??????? ????????? ????? ????? ????? ???????? ????????? ??????????? ? ????????????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ?? ??????? ? ????? ??? ??? ???? ? ??????????????? ????????????. ?????? ???????????? ???? ???. ?? ? ?????? ???????? ???????? ?? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ??? ? ????? ????????????? ??????? ????????. ?? ??? ?????? ????????? ?????? ?????? ????????. ? ??????? ?????? ????? ??????? ?? ? ???????? ? ??? ??? ?????? ?? ??????????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ?????. ?????? ???? ????? ?? ?? ??? ??? ???. ????????????? ??????? ? ??? ???????? ????? ???????? ??? ??? ?? ???? ?? ????? ??????? ???????? ???????????? ?????????? ??? ????????. ? ???? ? ???? ????? ????? 5 ??????????? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ?????? ??????? ????? ??? ??? ??????? ? ? ????????????? ??????? ? ???.
December 27th, 2008 at 5:03 am
Soft,
December 28th, 2008 at 7:29 am
ultram 377
January 2nd, 2009 at 11:48 pm
Hello, thx for all, brazzers trailers, wqxa,
January 3rd, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Hi, good site,
January 3rd, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Hello, thx for all,
January 4th, 2009 at 7:19 am
airfare military cheap discount
January 16th, 2009 at 9:54 am
websites like pornhub
January 16th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
site like pornhub
January 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
alexis texas pornhub
January 25th, 2009 at 5:24 am
Hi, good site, booty tube, pnfmtd,
February 17th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Hi, good site, vxzsx, %PP,
February 28th, 2009 at 10:48 am
My site is great, you porn milf, 72148,
February 28th, 2009 at 11:20 pm
Soft, amy reid pornhub, >:-DDD,
March 3rd, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Hi, visit my link please, mujeres cojiendo, 334,
May 25th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
suborn virginia slims ultra reflection cigarettes
tawdry doral cigarette cheaply doral cigarette|penurious doral cigarettes
cut-price doral cigarettes cheap doral cigarettes
inferior gpc cigarette cheap gpc cigarettes
economical gpc cigarettes budget-priced gpc cigarettes
discount pall mall cigarettes